By John T. Ishiyama, Marijke Breuning
through ninety nine entries or "mini-chapters," the SAGE twenty first Century Reference sequence volumes on political technology spotlight crucial themes, concerns, questions, and debates any scholar acquiring a level during this box should have mastered for effectiveness within the twenty first century. 21st Century Political technology: A Reference guide serves as an authoritative reference resource that meets scholars' examine wishes with extra precise details than encyclopedia entries yet no longer lots jargon, element, or density as a magazine article or a examine instruction manual chapter.
Read Online or Download 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook PDF
Similar dictionaries books
The call for for a competent and updated English-Russian felony reference has turn into obtrusive because the finish of the chilly battle, which has resulted in wide ties with the previous Soviet Union in a number of parts. quite, felony legislation wishes references that bridge cross-cultural conversation within the felony area.
This fun little dictionary, initially revealed in Winnipeg in 1913, serves up the slang spoken within the West first and foremost of the century.
- The Piazza Tales (Webster's French Thesaurus Edition)
- 501 Vocabulary Questions (Skill Builder in Focus)
- A Connecticut Yankee in King Arthur's Court (Webster's Korean Thesaurus Edition)
- Everyday Idioms For Reference and Practice [Book Two] [English]
- Milet Picture Dictionary: English-Arabic
Additional resources for 21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook
1969). The new revolution in political science. American Political Science Review, 63, 1051 1061. Easton, D. (1971). ). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Easton, D. (1992). The current meaning of behavioralism. In B. ), Approaches to the study of politics (pp. 47 48). New York: Macmillan. Farr, J. (1990). Francis Lieber and the interpretation of American political science. Journal of Politics, 52, 1027 1049. Fried, A. (2006). The forgotten Lindsey Rogers and the develop ment of American political science.
Lowell, A. L. (1910). The physiology of politics: Presidential address, sixth annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. American Political Science Association, 4, 1 15. Macridis, R. C. (1992). Major characteristics of the traditional approach. In B. ), Approaches to the study of pol itics (pp. 16 26). New York: Macmillan. McClosky, H. (1964). Consensus and ideology in American pol itics. American Political Science Review, 58, 361 382. Melanson, P. H. (1974). Review: The presentation of professional self: Post behavioral currents.
2006). The forgotten Lindsey Rogers and the develop ment of American political science. American Political Science Review, 100, 555 561. Goodnow, F. (1904). The work of the American Political Science Association. Proceedings of the American Political Science Association, 1, 35 46. Gunnell, J. G. (2006). The founding of the American Political Science Association: Discipline, profession, political theory, and poli tics. American Political Science Review, 100, 479 486. Isaak, A. C. (1985). Scope and methods of political science: An introduction to the methodology of political inquiry.
21st Century Political Science: A Reference Handbook by John T. Ishiyama, Marijke Breuning